FEBRUARY 9, 2012
Small Business Insurance Exchanges
EDITOR'S NOTE: An updated brief was published February 6, 2014.
States must form new marketplaces aimed at helping small companies buy coverage more easily and cheaply.
|What's the issue?
The Affordable Care Act requires states to create health insurance exchanges, or marketplaces, where small businesses can review, compare, and purchase health insurance. They are one of two types of exchanges that are to be created under the law, the second of which is aimed at individuals.
The small business exchanges, to be created under the law's Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP), will offer group health plans to small companies. The exchanges are supposed to offer a variety of health plans; provide comparative information on benefits, costs, and quality; and facilitate enrollment in a plan of choice.
States have the option of creating these as separate exchanges or combining the individual and small-business markets in one exchange. Although both types of exchanges will have similar functions, they will have unique attributes reflecting the needs of the populations they serve. This Health Policy Brief focuses on issues that states have to confront in designing SHOP exchanges as well as challenges that these exchanges are likely to face.
|What's the background?
Policy makers have long been concerned about small businesses' having access to affordable health insurance. The smaller the number of employees, the less likely a firm is to offer health benefits. Premiums for small-business coverage tend to be more expensive per worker because of the higher costs of marketing and administering a health plan for a small group of people, fixed administrative costs spread over fewer people, and costs associated with what's called adverse selection. Adverse selection occurs when a disproportionate number of higher-risk people purchase coverage because they are more likely to need and draw benefits, driving up future costs.
SMALL-BUSINESS CHALLENGES: Small companies often have difficulty "shopping" for health insurance because health plans can vary greatly in the benefits they cover; the cost sharing that they require of people enrolled in the plan; and the providers that are included in a plan's network, if it has one. Because small companies usually lack expertise in managing health insurance benefits, they often rely on agents and brokers to help them select a plan. What's more, small businesses must often pick only one plan for all of their workers because insurance companies typically impose rules that require a minimum number of workers to participate.
The Affordable Care Act's SHOP provisions seek to make it easier for small employers to compare health care plans and offer their employees choices in coverage without making premiums more expensive. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that, by 2019, an estimated 28 million Americans will be covered through the individual and SHOP exchanges. This will give the exchange markets the same market power that large employers have, or more, according to a recent report by the National Academy of Social Insurance.
|What's in the law?|
Every state is required to establish both individual and SHOP exchanges that are to be available for open enrollment in October 2013 and fully functional as of January 2014. States may establish separate individual and small-business exchanges or combine these into a single entity (with separate risk pools, if the state prefers). SHOP exchanges will serve small companies, defined as those having no more than 100 employees, on average. During the first two years, states may restrict participation in SHOP exchanges to businesses having up to 50 employees. Starting in 2017, states may allow larger employers to participate.
There is no requirement that individuals or small businesses use the exchanges, as there will continue to be an insurance market outside of the exchanges. Employers may also continue to self-insure, thereby avoiding many market regulations and the requirement for community rating, which requires premium costs to be the same for everyone, regardless of their age or health status.
A SHOP exchange may be set up as an executive branch agency, an independent government authority, or a nonprofit corporation. States may also partner with other states to form a regional exchange or may create subsidiaries within a state as long as the geography of the entire state is covered. SHOP exchanges must be operational by October 1, 2013, in time to conduct the first open enrollment period for coverage that will be effective January 1, 2014.
States are currently at differing stages of progress when it comes to establishing and implementing exchanges (Exhibit 1). If a state ultimately chooses not to establish a SHOP exchange, or if it's determined that an exchange will not be fully operational in time, the federal government will set up and operate the exchange. The federal government may operate the exchange directly or through contract with a nonprofit entity, or it may partner with the state and share responsibility for some of the exchange's functions.
As discussed below, the core functions that a SHOP exchange must perform include selection and certification of the health plans that will be offered, consumer education and assistance, eligibility determinations, plan enrollment, and premium billing and collection.
CHALLENGES: To be successful, SHOP exchanges need to attract sufficient participation among small businesses to establish a broad, stable risk pool and to be self-sustaining. To this end, they will need to demonstrate value by relieving employers of some administrative burdens and, more important, by moderating cost increases. States will also need to ensure that there is a level playing field in terms of regulations and premium rating for plans sold both inside and outside of the exchange.
In addition, some small companies may opt to avoid regulations by maintaining a "grandfathered" health insurance plan (one in effect at the time the Affordable Care Act was passed and allowed to continue) or by choosing to self-insure and thus avoid certain requirements. (See the Health Policy Brief published October 29, 2010, for more information on grandfathered health plans.)
State and federal efforts to create health insurance exchanges will intensify during 2012. States must enact enabling legislation or take necessary regulatory action to create their exchanges. At the federal level, regulations and guidance pertaining to many complex issues are still under development but must be released in time for states to design their exchanges and apply for approval by HHS by January 1, 2013.
As of the publication date of this policy brief, it appears very likely that the federal government will have to step in and establish exchanges in some states. So far, 49 states and the District of Columbia have collectively received nearly $730 million in federal exchange grants. But as of November 29, 2011, only 28 states and the District of Columbia have been awarded Exchange Establishment Grants to move from planning to implementation. Additional states applied for establishment grants in December 2011, and HHS expects to announce awards in mid-February 2012. Several states have indicated that they do not intend to implement the exchanges, and the governors of Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin have returned some or all of the exchange grants that their states initially applied for and received.
Implementation of the Affordable Care Act is taking place in a politically charged environment. The US Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of various provisions of the law by mid-2012. Depending on the outcome, there could be significant changes affecting the establishment of SHOP exchanges. Election-year politics and the outcome of national elections in November 2012 could also affect implementation efforts at the federal and state levels.
Bachrach, Deborah and Patricia Boozang, "Federally-Facilitated Exchanges and the Continuum of State Options," National Academy of Social Insurance, December 2011.
Collins, Sara R. and Tracy Garber, "State Health Insurance Exchange Legislation: A Progress Report," Commonwealth Fund, January 11, 2012.
Hall, Mark A., "Regulating Stop-Loss Coverage May Be Needed to Deter Self-Insuring Small Employers from Undermining Market Reforms," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 316-23.
Jost, Timothy S., "Employers and the Exchanges under the Small Business Health Options Program: Examining the Potential and the Pitfalls," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 267-74.
Kingsdale, Jon, "How Small Business Health Exchanges Can Offer Value to Their Future Customers--and Why They Must," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 275-83.
Weiner, Jonathan P., Erin Trish, Chad Abrams, and Klaus Lemke, "Adjusting for Risk Selection in State Health Insurance Exchanges Will Be Critically Important and Feasible, but Not Easy," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 306-15.
|About Health Policy Briefs||
Editorial review by
Health Policy Briefs are produced under a partnership of Health Affairs and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Sign up for free policy briefs at:
- From The Editor-In-Chief
- 2014 Behavioral Health Spending
- Veterans' Mental Health Service Use
- Mental Health Care Disparities
- Quality Measurement For Behavioral Health
- Mental Health Parity Emerges
- Drug Monitoring and Opioid Prescribing
- Gun Violence, Mental Illness, Gun Laws
- Suicide Prevention As A New Priority
- The Recovery Movement
- Behavioral Health Information Technology
- Media Coverage of US Mental Illness
- Narrative Matters: Refugee Children
- View Table of Contents »
- Do Pediatricians Have A Role In Addressing Maternal Depression? New Medicaid Guidance Shows The Way 29 Jun 2016
- Time To Fix The Black Hole In Medicare Data 29 Jun 2016
- Is There Any Room Left For Empirical Research On Family Planning? 28 Jun 2016
- Health Costs, But Not Obamacare, Dominate The Future Of Federal Spending 27 Jun 2016
- Obama Administration Threads Needle In Risk Corridor Case Brief 27 Jun 2016
Now Playing Global Health: Patient Safety, Cancer Care, Universal Health Coverage and InnovationBriefing June 14, 2016
- The Future Of The Individual And Small Group Markets May 18, 2016
- Asthma And Injustice On Chicago's Southeast Side May 02, 2016
- Patients' And Consumers' Use Of Evidence April 07, 2016
- Variation In Health Outcomes: The Role Of Spending On Social Services, Public Health, And Health Care, 2000-09
- A More Detailed Understanding Of Factors Associated With Hospital Profitability
- Steady Increase In Prices For Oral Anticancer Drugs After Market Launch Suggests A Lack Of Competitive Pressure
- The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And Cost
- Cancer Drugs Provide Positive Value In Nine Countries, But The United States Lags In Health Gains Per Dollar Spent
- Patients' And Consumers' Use Of Evidence
- Understanding An Informed Public's Views On The Role Of Evidence In Making Health Care Decisions
- Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Health Care To Engage Patients And Enhance Care
- Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care
- The Patient Engagement Imperative