Article
FEBRUARY 9, 2012
Small Business Insurance Exchanges
States must form new marketplaces aimed at helping small companies buy coverage more easily and cheaply.
| What's the issue? |
||
The Affordable Care Act requires states to create health insurance exchanges, or marketplaces, where small businesses can review, compare, and purchase health insurance. They are one of two types of exchanges that are to be created under the law, the second of which is aimed at individuals. The small business exchanges, to be created under the law's Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP), will offer group health plans to small companies. The exchanges are supposed to offer a variety of health plans; provide comparative information on benefits, costs, and quality; and facilitate enrollment in a plan of choice. States have the option of creating these as separate exchanges or combining the individual and small-business markets in one exchange. Although both types of exchanges will have similar functions, they will have unique attributes reflecting the needs of the populations they serve. This Health Policy Brief focuses on issues that states have to confront in designing SHOP exchanges as well as challenges that these exchanges are likely to face. |
||
| What's the background? |
||
Policy makers have long been concerned about small businesses' having access to affordable health insurance. The smaller the number of employees, the less likely a firm is to offer health benefits. Premiums for small-business coverage tend to be more expensive per worker because of the higher costs of marketing and administering a health plan for a small group of people, fixed administrative costs spread over fewer people, and costs associated with what's called adverse selection. Adverse selection occurs when a disproportionate number of higher-risk people purchase coverage because they are more likely to need and draw benefits, driving up future costs. SMALL-BUSINESS CHALLENGES: Small companies often have difficulty "shopping" for health insurance because health plans can vary greatly in the benefits they cover; the cost sharing that they require of people enrolled in the plan; and the providers that are included in a plan's network, if it has one. Because small companies usually lack expertise in managing health insurance benefits, they often rely on agents and brokers to help them select a plan. What's more, small businesses must often pick only one plan for all of their workers because insurance companies typically impose rules that require a minimum number of workers to participate. The Affordable Care Act's SHOP provisions seek to make it easier for small employers to compare health care plans and offer their employees choices in coverage without making premiums more expensive. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that, by 2019, an estimated 28 million Americans will be covered through the individual and SHOP exchanges. This will give the exchange markets the same market power that large employers have, or more, according to a recent report by the National Academy of Social Insurance. |
||
| What's in the law? | ||
Every state is required to establish both individual and SHOP exchanges that are to be available for open enrollment in October 2013 and fully functional as of January 2014. States may establish separate individual and small-business exchanges or combine these into a single entity (with separate risk pools, if the state prefers). SHOP exchanges will serve small companies, defined as those having no more than 100 employees, on average. During the first two years, states may restrict participation in SHOP exchanges to businesses having up to 50 employees. Starting in 2017, states may allow larger employers to participate. There is no requirement that individuals or small businesses use the exchanges, as there will continue to be an insurance market outside of the exchanges. Employers may also continue to self-insure, thereby avoiding many market regulations and the requirement for community rating, which requires premium costs to be the same for everyone, regardless of their age or health status. A SHOP exchange may be set up as an executive branch agency, an independent government authority, or a nonprofit corporation. States may also partner with other states to form a regional exchange or may create subsidiaries within a state as long as the geography of the entire state is covered. SHOP exchanges must be operational by October 1, 2013, in time to conduct the first open enrollment period for coverage that will be effective January 1, 2014. States are currently at differing stages of progress when it comes to establishing and implementing exchanges (Exhibit 1). If a state ultimately chooses not to establish a SHOP exchange, or if it's determined that an exchange will not be fully operational in time, the federal government will set up and operate the exchange. The federal government may operate the exchange directly or through contract with a nonprofit entity, or it may partner with the state and share responsibility for some of the exchange's functions. Exhibit 1 As discussed below, the core functions that a SHOP exchange must perform include selection and certification of the health plans that will be offered, consumer education and assistance, eligibility determinations, plan enrollment, and premium billing and collection.
CHALLENGES: To be successful, SHOP exchanges need to attract sufficient participation among small businesses to establish a broad, stable risk pool and to be self-sustaining. To this end, they will need to demonstrate value by relieving employers of some administrative burdens and, more important, by moderating cost increases. States will also need to ensure that there is a level playing field in terms of regulations and premium rating for plans sold both inside and outside of the exchange. In addition, some small companies may opt to avoid regulations by maintaining a "grandfathered" health insurance plan (one in effect at the time the Affordable Care Act was passed and allowed to continue) or by choosing to self-insure and thus avoid certain requirements. (See the Health Policy Brief published October 29, 2010, for more information on grandfathered health plans.) |
||
| What's next? | ||
State and federal efforts to create health insurance exchanges will intensify during 2012. States must enact enabling legislation or take necessary regulatory action to create their exchanges. At the federal level, regulations and guidance pertaining to many complex issues are still under development but must be released in time for states to design their exchanges and apply for approval by HHS by January 1, 2013. As of the publication date of this policy brief, it appears very likely that the federal government will have to step in and establish exchanges in some states. So far, 49 states and the District of Columbia have collectively received nearly $730 million in federal exchange grants. But as of November 29, 2011, only 28 states and the District of Columbia have been awarded Exchange Establishment Grants to move from planning to implementation. Additional states applied for establishment grants in December 2011, and HHS expects to announce awards in mid-February 2012. Several states have indicated that they do not intend to implement the exchanges, and the governors of Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin have returned some or all of the exchange grants that their states initially applied for and received. Implementation of the Affordable Care Act is taking place in a politically charged environment. The US Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of various provisions of the law by mid-2012. Depending on the outcome, there could be significant changes affecting the establishment of SHOP exchanges. Election-year politics and the outcome of national elections in November 2012 could also affect implementation efforts at the federal and state levels. |
||
| Resources |
||
Bachrach, Deborah and Patricia Boozang, "Federally-Facilitated Exchanges and the Continuum of State Options," National Academy of Social Insurance, December 2011. Collins, Sara R. and Tracy Garber, "State Health Insurance Exchange Legislation: A Progress Report," Commonwealth Fund, January 11, 2012. Hall, Mark A., "Regulating Stop-Loss Coverage May Be Needed to Deter Self-Insuring Small Employers from Undermining Market Reforms," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 316-23. Jost, Timothy S., "Employers and the Exchanges under the Small Business Health Options Program: Examining the Potential and the Pitfalls," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 267-74. Kingsdale, Jon, "How Small Business Health Exchanges Can Offer Value to Their Future Customers--and Why They Must," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 275-83. Weiner, Jonathan P., Erin Trish, Chad Abrams, and Klaus Lemke, "Adjusting for Risk Selection in State Health Insurance Exchanges Will Be Critically Important and Feasible, but Not Easy," Health Affairs 31, no. 2 (2012): 306-15. |
||
| About Health Policy Briefs |
Written by Editorial review by Len Nichols Ted Agres Anne Schwartz Susan Dentzer Health Policy Briefs are produced under a partnership of Health Affairs and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Cite as: Sign up for free policy briefs at: |
Current Issue
- From the Founding Editor
- Entry Point: Long-Term Care Commission
- Is The Slowdown Permanent?
- Recalculating Spending Projections
- Medicare And Global Payments
- Medicare Savings In Postacute Care
- Supplemental Coverage And Spending Growth
- How To Sustain Medicare
- Reforming Medicare
- The Medicare Essential Option
- Standardized Clinical Assessments
- Updating Bundled Payments
- Recession And Behavioral Health Spending
- View Table of Contents »
- The Latest Health Wonk Review 24 May 2013
- Implementing Health Reform: Contraception Coverage And The Liberty University Case 23 May 2013
- How Ideas From Private Industry Help Combat Medicare Fraud, Waste, And Abuse 23 May 2013
- A Life-Course Approach to Vaccination Can Drive Healthy Aging 22 May 2013
- Seven Policy Recommendations To Improve Quality Measurement 22 May 2013
- Foundation Blogs Round-Up: Medicare, Environmental Health, Patient-Centered Care, and More 16 May 2013
- Nicole Lurie speech on emergency preparedness; health reform session: 2013 GIH meeting tidbits 09 May 2013
- Poll: Many Adults in One State Think Voters Should Decide Whether Marijuana for Medical Use Is Legalized 05 May 2013
- Gates Foundation and Partners Launch New Strategy for Eradicating Polio 01 May 2013
- Foundation Initiative Uses Expanded View of Health: Including Its Social and Environmental Determinants 23 Apr 2013
- "Tackling The Cost Conundrum" Event May 07, 2013
- "The 'Triple Aim' Goes Global" Event April 11, 2013
- Tackling The Cost Conundrum May 07, 2013
- The 'Triple Aim' Goes Global April 11, 2013
- New Era Of Patient Engagement February 06, 2013
- Growth In US Health Spending 2011 January 07, 2013
- Annual Medical Spending Attributable To Obesity: Payer-And Service-Specific Estimates
- How Health Systems Could Avert ‘Triple Fail’ Events That Are Harmful, Are Costly, And Result In Poor Patient Satisfaction
- Health Care Cost Containment Strategies Used In Four Other High-Income Countries Hold Lessons For The United States
- Inviting Consumers To Downsize Fast-Food Portions Significantly Reduces Calorie Consumption
- The ‘Triple Aim’ Goes Global, And Not A Minute Too Soon
- Annual Medical Spending Attributable To Obesity: Payer-And Service-Specific Estimates
- Health Care Cost Containment Strategies Used In Four Other High-Income Countries Hold Lessons For The United States
- How Health Systems Could Avert ‘Triple Fail’ Events That Are Harmful, Are Costly, And Result In Poor Patient Satisfaction
- The ‘Triple Aim’ Goes Global, And Not A Minute Too Soon
- Immigration Reform: A Long Road To Citizenship And Insurance Coverage
- Wellness Incentives In The Workplace: Cost Savings Through Cost Shifting To Unhealthy Workers
- Redesigning Primary Care: A Strategic Vision To Improve Value By Organizing Around Patients’ Needs
- Even As Mortality Fell In Most US Counties, Female Mortality Nonetheless Rose In 42.8 Percent Of Counties From 1992 To 2006
- Cesarean Delivery Rates Vary Tenfold Among US Hospitals; Reducing Variation May Address Quality And Cost Issues
- A Hospital System’s Wellness Program Linked To Health Plan Enrollment Cut Hospitalizations But Not Overall Costs

