Press Release


For Immediate Release Contact

 

Sue Ducat
Director of Communications
(301) 841-9962
sducat@projecthope.org

   

From Health Affairs:

 

Where Can We Find Savings in Health Care?

 

Bethesda, MD -- The June issue of Health Affairs features various approaches to cost savings in the US health care system. A variety of articles analyze the effects of potential policy solutions on the Medicare and Medicaid programs and their impact on the health of beneficiaries and tax payer wallets.

 

Federal approaches to reduce obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates by improving nutrition could work—but the how matters. Sanjay Basu of the Stanford University School of Medicine and coauthors modeled the effects of two policy approaches to reforming the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which serves one in seven Americans. They found that ending a subsidy for sugar-sweetened beverage purchases with SNAP dollars would result in a decrease in obesity of 281,000 adults and 141,000 children, through a 15.4 percent reduction in calories by the lowering of purchases of this source. They also found that a $.30 credit back on every dollar spent on qualifying fruits and vegetables could more than double the number of SNAP participants who meet federal guidelines for fruit and vegetable consumption. With more than forty-six million people receiving SNAP food stamp benefits, the authors suggest that policy makers closely examine the implications of such proposals at the population level to determine which will benefit people’s health the most and prove most cost-effective.


  • If you’re between ages 15–39 when you are diagnosed with cancer, the implications later in life extend well beyond your health. Gery P. Guy Jr. of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and coauthors examined Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data and determined that survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers had annual per person medical expenditures of $7,417, compared to $4,247 for adults without a cancer history. They also found an annual per capita lost productivity of $4,564 per cancer survivor compared to $2,314 for adults without a cancer history. They suggest that the disparities are associated with ongoing medical care needs and employment challenges connected to cancer survivorship, and that having health insurance alone is not enough to close the gap. The authors stress the importance of access to lifelong follow-up care and education to help lessen the economic burden of this important population of cancer survivors.

  • Optional Medicaid policies can help pregnant women quit smoking, but do they result in healthier babies? Marian Jarlenski of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and coauthors analyzed the effects in nineteen states of Medicaid presumptive eligibility (coverage while an application is pending) and the unborn-child option (coverage without documentation of citizenship or residency) and found that neither approach significantly improved rates of preterm birth or babies born small for their gestational age. However, they did find that presumptive eligibility resulted in a 7.7 percentage-point increase in smoking cessation among low-income pregnant women eligible for Medicaid, whose smoking rates are almost twice as high as in the general population of pregnant women. The authors recommend presumptive eligibility enrollment for consideration as a mechanism to promote both smoking cessation and earlier prenatal care, but point out that multiple, concurrent interventions may be necessary to ultimately affect birth outcomes.

A series of papers focus directly on cost-savings:

 

Patient-Centered Medical Home Initiative Produced Modest Results For The Veterans Health Administration, 2010–12 by Paul L. Hebert of the VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington and coauthors

CDC Central-Line Bloodstream Infection Prevention Efforts Produced Net Benefits Of At Least $640 Million During 1990–2008 by Robert D. Scott II of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and colleagues

A Simple Change To The Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy Program Could Save $5 Billion A Year by Yuting Zhang of the University of Pittsburgh and colleagues

 

Switching To Less Expensive Blindness Drug Could Save Medicare Part B $18 Billion Over A Ten-Year Period by David Hutton of the University of Michigan and colleagues

NOTE: Publication of Health Affairs’ June 2014 issue also marks the arrival of Alan Weil as its new editor-in-chief. Weil, a highly respected expert in health policy, has been the executive director of the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) since 2004. Prior to his leadership of NASHP, Weil served in both the public and private sectors. He directed the Urban Institute’s “Assessing New Federalism” project; was the executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing and a health policy advisor to Colorado’s then-governor, Roy Romer; and was the assistant general counsel in the Massachusetts Department of Medical Security. To read more about Alan Weil and his vision for Health Affairs, visit Health Affairs Blog.

 
About Health Affairs
 

Health Affairs is the leading journal at the intersection of health, health care, and policy. Published by Project HOPE, the peer-reviewed journal appears each month in print, with additional Web First papers published periodically at www.healthaffairs.org. The full text of each Health Affairs Web First paper is available free of charge to all website visitors for a one-week period following posting, after which it switches to pay-per-view for nonsubscribers. Web First papers are supported in part by a grant from The Commonwealth Fund. You can also find the journal on Facebook and Twitter. Read daily perspectives on Health Affairs Blog. Download our podcasts, including monthly Narrative Matters essays, on iTunes. Tap into Health Affairs content with the new iPad app.