![]()
| Embargoed
for release Wednesday, August 28, 2002 at 12:01a.m. EST |
For
further information contact: Jon Gardner: (301) 656-7401 ext. 230 ON AUG. 28: call (240) 418-1591 jgardner@projecthope.org |
State
Laws Requiring Insurers to Renew Individual Health Coverage Make
More Drastic Market Intrusion Unnecessary, Health Affairs Article Says
Renewal Mandates
Keep Premium Variations in Check
Without Making Insurance Vulnerable to Manipulation
BETHESDA, MDState
lawmakers trying to stabilize the individual health insurance market and protect
high risks don't need to look to such regulatory schemes as community rating
because most already have in force a strong policy tool, according to a new
article published today on the Health Affairs Web site.
Nearly every state requires insurers selling individual policies to guarantee
that enrollees can renew their policies at the average premium for their underwriting
class, a contract provision known as "guaranteed renewability," write
authors Vip Patel and Mark Pauly. Ensuring fair market rules for the individual
market are important for a sizable share of the population, since it is the
main source of insurance coverage for nonpoor working families whose employers
don't offer insurance.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 required guaranteed
renewability but did not impose any restriction on premium increases. In regulating
the individual insurance market, however, all but four states have followed
the textbook definition of guaranteed renewability, which prohibits premium
increases based on enrollees' claims history or health status.
The article argues that guaranteed renewability effectively pools risk and protects
consumers from price increases without resorting to heavy regulation of the
market or reduced consumer choice. It protects insurers against adverse selection
because it prevents those who know they are likely to get sick from buying more
generous coverage at the guaranteed renewable rate. Community rating, on the
other hand, has a history of driving up costs for some insurers who are burdened
with the sickest enrollees, and "cream skimming" by other insurers
who seek to enroll only young, healthy individuals who won't make many claims,
the authors write.
The authors acknowledge, however, that consumers can game guaranteed renewability
if they know upon enrollment that they have conditions that could lead to numerous
claims. Likewise, insurers could game the system by raising average premiums
so much that many lower risks drop out and effectively form a new underwriting
class, causing the higher-risk plan to self-destruct. But the authors argue
that likely consumer desertion of insurers who repeatedly engage in that practice
will guard against such conduct by insurers.
Patel is the founder of eHealthInsurance Inc., which markets individual and
small-group insurance products online to the public. Pauly is a health care
scholar at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
Health Affairs, published
by Project HOPE, is a bimonthly multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing
the leading edge in health policy thought and research.
©2002 Project HOPEThe People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.