EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 4:00 p.m. ET
 

For more information contact:
Kari Root or Jessie Pinkrah,
301-652-1558

Rob Cunningham at Health Affairs,
301-656-7401

Malpractice Crisis Under The Microscope: New Health Affairs Study Finds That Malpractice Payouts Have Not Grown Substantially 

Meanwhile, Vulnerable Physicians Flock To States That Cap Malpractice Awards

Bethesda, MD Contrary to popular belief, growth in malpractice payments was consistent with increases in health care spending between 1991 and 2003. In fact, payments grew only 4 percent per year during that period, according to a study released today by the journal Health Affairs. According to the authors, extreme judgment awards did not drive the increases.

Meanwhile, another online Health Affairs study released today finds that physicians are gravitating toward states that have capped malpractice awards. This trend is particularly pronounced among obstetricians, who are most vulnerable to lawsuits. Between 1975 and 2000, the number of obstetricians in states that had enacted caps in the 1980s increased five times more than in those states without caps (40 percent versus 8 percent).

“We already know that physicians’ fears related to malpractice lawsuits affect how they practice medicine. Now we’re finding that these fears affect where they choose to practice,” said Health Affairs founding editor John Iglehart. “Yet these concerns seem out of proportion to what’s really happening with malpractice suits – and so, for that matter, are the sharp increases in malpractice premiums.”

In 2002, on average, malpractice premiums for internists, general surgeons, and obstetricians rose 20–25 percent. Specialists in some states have seen one-year increases of 75 percent. Physician groups contend that premiums are soaring because of out-of-control malpractice payments and have called for a nationwide $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages. President Bush has endorsed that proposal.

Yet 96 percent of malpractice cases never go to trial and are settled out of court, according to data by the authors of the first Health Affairs study. News reports about very large jury verdicts can be misleading, they say, because the final award is often reduced substantially.

“The large jury awards that attract so much public attention actually are rare events and comprise a very small portion of all malpractice payments,” said lead study author Amitabh Chandra of Dartmouth College. “They’re certainly not key drivers of malpractice insurance increases.” Instead, he and his colleagues argue that the increase in payments parallels the increase in health care spending. Factors such as state regulation of malpractice insurers, as well as changes in investment income, are better explanations for the increase in malpractice premiums.

You can read the study by Amitabh Chandra and colleagues at http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w5.240.

The researchers analyzed data from the National Practitioner Data Bank, where all malpractice payments made on behalf on a physician must be reported. They found that between 1991 and 2003:

 Malpractice Caps Influence Where Physicians Practice

Still, the second Health Affairs study found that states that have capped nonmonetary awards for pain and suffering and punitive damages have also attracted more doctors into practice. Twenty-seven states now have such caps. (See list below.)

In their analysis of state policy responses to the last two malpractice insurances crises, study authors William Encinosa and Fred Hellinger of the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) say that caps on payouts appear to influence where physicians decide to practice. While the median number of physicians per 100,000 residents grew 83 percent between 1970 and 2000 in states that have never had a cap, that number grew 102 percent in states that enacted caps in the 1980s. Surgeons and obstetricians, two groups that are particularly vulnerable to lawsuits, appear to be most influenced by the presence or absence of caps.

Overall, the researchers found caps accounted for about 5 additional doctors per 100,000 people in the three years after their enactment. States with caps of $250,000 saw greater increases in surgeons and obstetricians than did states with caps of $400,000 or higher. These effects were even larger for rural counties, which have difficulties attracting physicians.

You can read the study by Encinosa and Hellinger at http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w5.250.

The following states have laws limiting potential damages in medical malpractice lawsuits: Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

###

Health Affairs, published by Project HOPE, is the leading journal of health policy. Peer-reviewed journal appears bimonthly in print with additional online-only papers published weekly as Health Affairs Web Exclusives at www.healthaffairs.org. The full text of this Health Affairs Web Exclusive is available free of charge to all Web site visitors for a two-week period following posting, after which it will revert to pay-per-view for nonsubscribers. The abstracts of all articles are free in perpetuity. Support for the publication of this Web Exclusive was provided by the California HealthCare Foundation; Web Exclusives are also supported in part by a grant from the Commonwealth Fund.

 

©2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.