For immediate release
Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2006
10:00 a.m. Eastern Time


Craig Palosky (202) 347-5270
Larry Levitt (650) 854-9400
Chris Fleming (301) 347-3944

Health Insurance Premium Growth Moderates Slightly In 2006, But Still Increases Twice As Fast As Wages And Inflation

Enrollment in Consumer-Directed Health Plans Remains Modest At 2.7 Million; Relatively Few Employers Expect To Adopt Such Plans Next Year

Washington, D.C. -- Premiums for employer-sponsored health coverage rose an average 7.7 percent in 2006, less than the 9.2 percent increase recorded in 2005 and the recent peak of 13.9 percent in 2003, according to the 2006 employer health benefits survey released today by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET). Key findings from the survey were also published today as a Health Affairs Web Exclusive.

This year’s survey recorded the slowest rate of premium growth since 2000, although premiums still increased more than twice as fast as workers’ wages (3.8 percent) and overall inflation (3.5 percent). Premiums have increased 87 percent over the past six years. Family health coverage now costs an average of $11,480 annually, with workers paying an average of $2,973 toward those premiums, about $1,354 more than in 2000.

“While premiums didn’t rise as fast as they have in recent years, working people don’t feel like they are getting any relief at all because their premiums have been rising so much faster than their paychecks,” said foundation president and CEO Drew E. Altman, Ph.D. “To working people and business owners, a reduction in an already very high rate of increase just means you’re still paying more.”

“The burden of a fragmented system of coverage falls heaviest on the small employer and their workers,” said HRET president Mary A. Pittman, Dr. P.H. “About two in five small businesses do not even offer health insurance, and those that do require workers on average to contribute significantly more to their premiums for family coverage” than in prior years.

Although there is substantial debate about consumer-driven health care, the survey finds modest enrollment in consumer-driven plans, with 2.7 million workers in high-deductible plans with a savings option, including those that qualify for health savings accounts (HSAs). About 4 percent of covered workers are enrolled in such plans, a rate statistically no different from last year. Relatively few firms that offer other types of health insurance say that they are “very likely” to adopt high-deductible plans that qualify for an HSA (4 percent) or that are associated with a health reimbursement arrangement, or HRA (6 percent) in the next year.

The annual Kaiser/HRET survey provides a detailed picture of how employer coverage is changing over time in terms of availability, costs, and coverage for the 155 million Americans who rely on employer-sponsored health insurance. It was conducted between January and May of 2006 and included 3,159 randomly selected, nonfederal public and private firms with three or more employees 2,122 of which responded to the full survey and 1,037 of which responded to an additional question about offering coverage).

HSAs And Other Consumer-Driven Plans

About 7 percent of employers offering health benefits offer high-deductible health plans with a savings option -- a category that includes both plans that qualify a worker to establish an HSA as well as those associated with an HRA. These tax-favored accounts that employees can use to pay for medical expenses are often described as consumer-driven because consumers pay directly for a greater share of their health care and may have an incentive to reduce their health care spending. Among firms with 1,000 or more workers, 12 percent offer an HSA-qualified plan.

An estimated 4 percent of covered workers are enrolled in high-deductible plans with a savings option, compared with 60 percent in preferred provider organizations (PPOs), 20 percent in health maintenance organizations (HMOs), 13 percent in point-of-service plans, and 3 percent in conventional indemnity plans. Among the 2.7 million workers estimated to be enrolled in HSAs or HRAs this year, 1.4 million are in HSA-qualified plans (up from 0.8 million estimated last year) and 1.3 million are in plans with HRAs (statistically unchanged from last year’s 1.6 million estimate).

Premiums for these plans averaged $3,405 annually for single coverage and $9,484 for family coverage. These are lower than the premiums for other types of health plans, likely in part because employee cost sharing is higher. However, contributions from the employer toward the savings accounts are not included. These average $743 for single coverage and $1,359 for family coverage. Including these costs, overall spending for these plans is on average similar to that for PPOs (the most common type of plan).

“We don't know yet whether workers and employers ultimately will embrace consumer-driven health plans in big numbers, but it certainly hasn't been a tidal wave,” said foundation vice president, Gary Claxton, coauthor of the study and director of the foundation’s Health Care Marketplace Project. “When you look at the total costs, the savings from these plans may not be enough to overcome consumer concerns about higher cost sharing.”

“We are still losing the race between premiums and workers’ earnings -- and if that trend persists, employer-based coverage will continue to decline as fewer employers and workers can afford the cost of coverage,” said Jon Gabel, a study coauthor and vice president of the Center for Studying Health System Change, also in Washington.

Other key findings include the following:

-- Offer rate. About 61 percent of firms nationally offer health benefits to at least some of their workers, statistically unchanged from last year’s offer rate (60 percent). Although nearly all large businesses (with at least 200 workers) offer health benefits to their workers, fewer than half of the smallest firms (with 3-9 workers) do.

-- Workers’ contributions toward premiums. On average, workers are paying $259 more this year than they did last year toward the cost of family health coverage. Workers at small firms (with 3-199 employees) on average contribute significantly more to their premiums ($3,550 for family coverage) than workers at larger companies ($2,658 for family coverage). On average, workers this year are paying about 16 percent of premiums for single coverage and 27 percent of premiums for family coverage, with their employers paying the rest. That share is essentially unchanged from recent years.

-- Cost sharing. In 2006 the average in-network PPO deductible for workers facing a deductible reached $473 for single coverage. Average copayments for drugs across plan types were $11 for generic drugs, $24 for preferred drugs, and $38 for nonpreferred drugs.

-- Confidence in cost containment strategies. Few employers have a lot of confidence in strategies to contain rising health care costs. For example, only 17 percent of small employers and 28 percent of large employers say that they consider disease management programs “very effective” at controlling health care costs. Employers were less likely to rate other strategies as very effective, including consumer-directed health plans (16 percent of small and 13 percent of large employers), higher employee cost sharing (15 percent of small and 13 percent of large firms), and tighter managed care networks (9 percent of small and 4 percent of large firms).

The Health Affairs article based on the survey is available at . The full survey is available online at

The survey is a joint project of the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust. A research team at Kaiser and HRET conducted and analyzed the survey, led by Gary Claxton, vice president and Director of the Health Care Marketplace Project at Kaiser, and Jon Gabel, vice president of the Center for Studying Health System Change, which works on the project under contract with HRET.

# # #



Health Affairs, published by Project HOPE, is the leading journal of health policy. The peer-reviewed journal appears bimonthly in print with additional online-only papers published weekly as Health Affairs Web Exclusives at


©2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.